Burckhardt, Hesse and Nietzsche: Which Pathway?

Authors

  • Ron Dart St. Stephen's University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70902/t41qnq51

Abstract

This article will touch on the critique of the modern liberal project by Burckhardt, Nietzsche, and Hesse—such a critique of liberal modernity tends to be seen as a form of conservatism. But, Burckhardt, Nietzsche, and Hesse understood the meaning of conservatism (each and all drawing from the classical ethos and tradition) in different ways and for different reasons. Each of them, also, had a concern for what it meant to care for the human journey (philanthropos) in diverging ways and for different reasons. This essay will reflect on their shared questioning of the modern project and its notions of the self and society but their diverging answers and prognosis to doubts and diagnosis of the modern and, in our ethos, postmodern project.

    

Author Biography

  • Ron Dart, St. Stephen's University

    Ron Dart taught in the department of Political Science (POLSC), Philosophy (PHIL), and Religious Studies (RELST) at the University of the Fraser Valley (Abbotsford, British Columbia) for almost 35 years. During the 1980s, he was on staff with Amnesty International and worked with the organization for about 15 years. Dart has published more than 40 books, focusing on Canadian High-Red Toryism, Canadian political philosophers Stephen Leacock, George Grant, and European writers such as Hermann Hesse, Jacob Burckhardt, and Friedrich Nietzsche. Currently, he teaches graduate courses at St. Stephen's University in New Brunswick and has been invited to return as professor emeritus to teach a few courses on Western political philosophy at the University of the Fraser Valley for the Winter 2025 semester.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-29